
Public
release date: 17-Mar-2008
[ |
E-mail Article ]
Contact: Suzanne Wu
swu@press.uchicago.edu
209-608-2038
University of Chicago Press Journals
Economists usually treat time like money – as
another scarce resource that people spend to achieve certain ends. Money is
used to pay for things like furniture and plane tickets; time is spent
assembling the do-it-yourself bookshelf or searching for cheap flights on
the Internet. But despite the old adage that time is money, the two are far
from psychologically equivalent, reveals a study from the April issue of the
Journal of Consumer Research – particularly when it comes to consumer
spending decisions.
In a series of experiments, Ritesh Saini
(George Mason University) and Ashwani Monga (University of Texas, San
Antonio) demonstrate that a qualitatively different form of decision making
gains prominence when consumers work with time instead of money.
Specifically, consumers thinking about expenditure of time are more likely
to rely on heuristics: intuitive, quick judgments based more on prior
experience than on analysis of the information presented.
For example, one experiment had participants
consider the purchase of a used car. They were told that a search on a
used-car website had yielded 80 cars meeting their criteria but that viewing
each accident record would take either $1 or 5 minutes of time. They were
then asked how many records they would like to view, with a catch: the
researchers used classic experimental “anchoring” techniques to manipulate
the answers.
Participants were asked whether they would
view “up to 2” or “up to 40” records, before indicating the specific number
of records they would view. The use of an anchor, for those thinking in
terms of time expenditure, turned out to have a significant impact.
When the anchor value was high in the time
condition, consumers chose to view an average of 23.7 accident reports,
versus 9.1 when the anchor value was low. The number of records consumers in
the money condition chose to view was statistically the same, irrespective
of whether the anchor value was high or low.
“People face difficulties in accounting for
time because they do not routinely transact in time as they do in money,”
explain the researchers. “Although people in some professions (e.g.,
lawyers) do keenly monitor their time expenditures, most other people are
not trained to do so.”
Furthermore, by measuring response times—the
time taken by participants to arrive at decisions—the researchers find
supporting evidence for the idea that quick and easy heuristics are used
more in time than in money.
“These results suggest that businesses need to
be aware that decisions regarding products and services might be made
differently if consumers spend their time rather than money,” Saini and
Monga explain. “Unlike money which is unambiguous—a dollar is a dollar in
all circumstances—the value of time changes from one situation to another.”
###
Ritesh Saini and Ashwani Monga, “How I Decide
Depends on What I Spend: Use of Heuristics Is Greater for Time than for
Money.” Journal of Consumer Research: April 2008.
[
|
E-mail Article ]