Home

Your Company
High-tech Projects
Engineering

Life Sciences
Science and Research

Professional Services
Manufacturing

Wholesale/Distribution

Our Company
About
Contact

Careers
Ballooning
Feedback / Questions

Services
System Implementation
Support
Consulting
Architecture
Customization

Products
Dynamics GP
Project Cost
Dynamics CRM

Useful Information
Helpful Insights
Studies and Articles


Copyright 1996-2009 Automation Consultants Incorporated
Swiss Lady
Certified Partner Logo

Risk Management Critical to Corporate Strategy


Dedham, MA – January 7, 2009 – With the consequences of the current financial crisis spreading to the real economy, lawmakers are exploring new regulations to govern the financial markets. The concern among market participants is that policy-makers do not fully understand how risk management does and should work, and how derivatives can be beneficial.

In the “MIT Roundtable on Corporate Risk Management” that appears in the Fall 2008 issue of Morgan Stanley’s Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, a distinguished group of academics and practitioners assess how risk management affects corporate growth and value.

For many companies, effective corporate risk management begins with an equity cushion in the capital structure. This helps to avoid raising prohibitively expensive capital following an adverse event. Excessive leverage contributed to the problems of many banks, leading to the current industry-wide de-leveraging.

Andrew Lo, Professor of Finance at the MIT Sloan School of Management and director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering, contends that too often what passes for risk management at many financial companies is really risk measurement. This offers little prescriptive advice on how to actually manage the risks, as opposed to corporate governance structures for actively and effectively managing risks. In addition, some of the current problems can be attributed to the failure of risk managers and their models to account for highly improbable events.

A paradox of risk-reducing financial innovation is that it tends to encourage market participants to increase risk-taking in other ways. Robert Merton of Harvard Business School and Nobel laureate in economics points out that the challenge from a regulatory standpoint is to find the right balance between these two offsetting forces.

“Moving forward, we need more financial engineers, not fewer – risk and innovation, including derivatives, are not going away, and we need senior managements, boards, and regulators of financial institutions who understand them,” Merton notes.

_________________________________________________________________

This study is published in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. Media wishing to receive a PDF of this article may contact journalnews@bos.blackwellpublishing.net.

To view the abstract for this article, please click here.

Don Chew, Editor of the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, can be reached for questions at don.chew@morganstanley.com.

Published since 1988 and reaching a broad audience of senior corporate policy makers, this highly regarded quarterly brings together academic thinkers and financial practitioners to address topics driving corporate value. The Journal covers a range of topics, including risk management, corporate strategy, corporate governance and capital structure. The Journal also features its popular roundtable discussions among corporate executives and academics, on topics such as integrity in financial reporting.

Media Contact

Amy Molnar
Publicity Associate
111 River St.

Hoboken, NJ 07030
USA
201-748-8844 (phone)
201-748-6088 (fax)
amolnar@wiley.com



About Wiley:

Careers  |   Locations  |   Investor Relations

 

ACinc Logo         Certified Computing Professionals